Read The Revenger's Tragedy by Thomas Middleton Online

the-revenger-s-tragedy

VINDICI And therefore I'll put on that knave for once, And be a right man then, a man a' th' time, For to be honest is not to be i' th' world. Brother, I'll be that strange-composed fellow....

Title : The Revenger's Tragedy
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 9781419180460
Format Type : Paperback
Number of Pages : 156 Pages
Status : Available For Download
Last checked : 21 Minutes ago!

The Revenger's Tragedy Reviews

  • BillKerwin
    2018-11-24 03:37

    Vindice, seeking revenge for the death of his betrothed who has been poisoned by the lascivious Duke she spurned, enlists the aid of his brother Hyppolito, dons a disreputable pimpalicious disguise, and eventually destroys the corrupt world he inhabits together with what little was left of his own innocence. Unlike the works of that universal genius Shakespeare, this play--which most modern scholars attribute to Thomas Middleton--could never be mistaken for a modern drama, for it is concerned neither with psychological depth nor consistency of tone; rather, it achieves its effects through a combination of impressive symbolic tableaux and highly-wrought language that together produce a complex moral perspective. Sometimes it seems like an absurd black farce in which soulless stick-figures rush toward inevitable destruction, and at others it appears more like a morality play or a Juvenalian satire with Vindice alternatively assuming the masks of the Vice or the Satirist. Underneath these masks, Vindice himself is infected by the evil he excoriates; he is both an avenging angel and a symptom of social and moral decline. Even the darkest corners of this world, however, are illuminated by Vindice's magnificent poetry--more beautiful than anything in Renaissance drama except for Marlowe, Webster and Shakespeare. If you won't take my word for it, check out what T.S. Eliot has to say on the subject.On second thought, see for yourself. Below is a speech spoken by Vindice to his mistress' skull, which he holds in his hand and soon plans to use as an instrument in his elaborate plan of revenge:"And now methinks I could e'en chide myselfFor doting on her beauty, though her deathShall be revenged after no common action.Does the Silk-worm expend her yellow laborsFor thee? for thee does she undo herself?Are Lordships sold to maintain LadyshipsFor the poor benefit of a bewitching minute?Why does yon fellow falsify highwaysAnd put his life between the Judge's lipsTo refine such a thing, keeps horse and menTo beat their valors for her?Surely we're all mad people, and theyWhome we think are, are not; we mistake those,Tis we are mad in sense, they but in clothes. . .Does every proud and self-affecting DameCamphor her face for this? And grieve her MakerIn sinful baths of milk, when many an infant starves,For her superfluous outside--all for this?Who now bids twenty pound a night, preparesMusic, perfumes, and sweetmeats? All are hushed.Thou mayest lie chaste now! It were fine methinks,To have thee seen at Revels, forgetful feasts,And unclean brothels. Sure, t'would fright the sinnerAnd make him a good coward, put a RevellerOut off his Antic ambleAnd cloy an Epicure with empty dishes.Here might a scornful and ambitious womanLook through and through herself. See Ladies, with false formsYou deceive men, but cannot deceive worms."

  • Bookdragon Sean
    2018-11-23 06:28

    Well, here’s three things I learnt after reading/watching this play: 1. Revenge makes you go crazy! 2. Revenge makes everyone power crazed!3. Revenge will get you killed! So my advice is to stay far away from it, that way you may live.

  • Jenn
    2018-12-13 02:31

    If I had never read a Shakespeare play in my life, I may have found this incredibly bloody and unsubtle play interesting or entertaining. It still may be, and, as I will be seeing a performance of it at the National Theatre in London in a few days, that may change my mind a little. However, it has all the elements of a typical revenge tragedy with none of the beauty or complexity of Hamlet. The characters are named things like Vindice (he's the revenger, if you couldn't tell), and like the evil sons and stepsons of the Duke: Lussurioso (the lustful one), Ambitioso (ahem), and my fave name, Supervacuo (basically breathing air here). Oh, and Spurio, the Duke's bastard. While I often find this kind of playfulness amusing, if not hilarious, I was out of patience with characters making bold statements of their intentions in front of other characters and those characters acting clueless about what they had just heard. Also, I can only suspend my disbelief so far, and it does not stretch to include believing that anyone would be deceived by Vindice's mistress's skull dressed up like a woman and that this "anyone" would believe that it IS a woman long enough to kiss it/her. Could be gross, intense, or funny... or absolutely unbelievable - which one do you think I thought? Actually, I think American cinema-goers as a mainstream, stereotyped body may really dig this play: it's totally obvious and has big neon signs pointing to the funny bits, the tragic bits, the disgusting bits, and the major theme bits. Give me Hamlet any day. I suppose I must give it around 3 stars, though, because it HAS been thought provoking, and it apparently a representative example of Jacobean drama. I think I would have loved going to the theatre then... ahem.

  • Dfordoom
    2018-12-16 01:50

    If you want murder and mayhem you really can't go past the Jacobean playwrights. This one, originally performed in 1606, is terrific fun. If Quentin Tarantino had been alive 400 years (and if he possessed any actual talent) he'd have written plays like this.

  • Greg
    2018-11-19 22:47

    Salingar, in a quote found in the introduction, said that The Revenger’s Tragedy “is the last, as well as the most brilliant, attempt to present the emotional conflicts of Renaissance socity within the framework of moral allegory.” This is a fantastic and succinct analysis. Throughout the play, themes of revenge intersect with themes of sin, justice, the role of women, and lust. The play continues to reverse flow, with multiple plot twists that provide layers of understanding for each of these themes. Tourner follows the basic form presented by Seneca, and even quotes him from the lips of his play’s namesake character, Hippolito, by stating “Curae leves loquuntur, majors stupent” (Light cares find speech, greater ones are silent). The play is structured around Vindice, who wants to revenge himself against the Duke for the death of his betrothed. Disaffection with the immorality of James I and his court provided the context for why the play was written. As the primary protagonist, Tourneur puts the best lines in Vindice’s mouth. My favorites are: “Now nine years’ vengeance crowd into a minute!” (67) “Has not heaven an ear? Is all the lightning wasted?” (89)“Ah, the fly-flop of vengeance beat ‘em to pieces! Here was the sweetest occasion, the fittest hour, to have made my revenge familiar with him: show him the body of the duke his father, and how quaintly he died like a politician, in hugger-mugger, made no man acquainted with it; and in catastrophe, slain him over his father’s breast, and—O, I’m mad to lose such a sweet opportunity.” (102)Perhaps the most memorable image, for me, however is the beautiful line spoken by Lussurioso, who states, “Alas, I shine in tears, like the sun in April.” (109) The image is beautiful, and I believe foreshadows a bit of rebirth in the tragedy of the story.

  • Matt
    2018-12-06 03:36

    The first time I read The Revenger's Tragedy, I hated it. One has to have an affinity for Jacobean revenge tragedy to "get" this play. Now, after several dozen examples of the genre have passed my eyes, I'm able to appreciate the humor built into this strange, strange play. From Vindice's entrance - skull in tow - to the abrupt and no-nonsense parody of Hamlet's "Mouse Trap," this play takes all the expectations of a revenge tragedy and flips them, comically, on their butts. I get it now, and it may be one of my new favorite plays.In the words of Gary Taylor, "Middleton is, like, way cool."

  • Zeynep
    2018-12-06 05:22

    drama, prostitutes and skulls.

  • majoringinliterature
    2018-12-05 23:24

    A man walks onstage holding a skull. He starts to speak.No, you're not watching Hamlet - though there's little doubt that it is a cheeky reference to one of the most recognisable scenes in English dramatic history.The play is The Revenger's Tragedy, written either by Cyril Tourneur or crowd favourite Thomas Middleton, depending on which scholar you believe. It is a confusing, bloody, and at times hilarious look at the revenge tragedy genre and, like all good revenge tragedies, there are gory deaths aplenty.The story's protagonist is Vindice, the aforementioned skull-handler. The skull belongs to his love, Gloriana, who was murdered by an unscrupulous Duke some nine years ago. As you can probably guess (based on the weird and obsessive hoarding of his beloved's bones) Vindice has had a little bit of trouble getting over it. So he devises a scheme to avenge Gloriana by disguising himself as a servant and insinuating himself with the Duke's son, Lussurioso. The usual murder, mayhem, and sexual escapades ensue. (view spoiler)[The play ends with a massacre that treads the line between tragedy and farce:[SUPERVACUO] Then I proclaim myself: now I am duke. AMBITIOSO Thou duke! Brother, thou liest. [Kills Supervacuo.] SPURIO Slave, so dost thou! [Kills Ambitioso.] FOURTH MAN Base villain, hast thou slain my lord and master? [Kills Spurio.](V:iii, ll. 58-61) (hide spoiler)]So, what to make of this strange play? An interesting suggestion, which I found particularly compelling, is that the play is a subtle critique of the Jacobean court. The play was first performed in 1606, several years after the death of Elizabeth I. Though James I had only been on the throne for a few years, there was already a great deal of discontent with his rule. People suggest that the lustful, small-minded Duke of the play, and his court of cruel, lazy, or just plain useless courtiers is a reflection of the state of English politics at the time. Vindice's beloved, we know, was called Gloriana; is it a coincidence that this is the famous name used to refer to Elizabeth I in the poetry of the Elizabethan period? The first scene could very well signal the kind of decay that has crept into the state since the glorious 'Virgin Queen' reigned. But if the play is nostalgic for the good old days of the female monarch, it is also quite unfair on women. The first act it filled with crimes against them: Vindice's mother is persuaded to try and sell her daughter off as a mistress to Lussurioso, and the Duke's stepson is charged with raping a lady of the court. (view spoiler)[These sexual politics continue to hover over the entire play, and none of the women in it come off particularly well. Worst of all is Junior, the man convinced of raping a courtier; when he is dragged off to be executed (I think I speak for everyone when I say that nobody is sorry for him), he delivers this absolutely disgusting speech:Must I bleed then without respect of sign? Well, My fault was sweet sport, which the world approves; I die for that which every woman loves. (III: IV, ll. 79-81)Bastard. Of course, the fact that Middleton/Tourneur doesn't even deign to give him a name (his two elder brothers both have one) could potentially be a signal that he is even less to be trusted than the other characters in the play. The fact that he gets accidentally murdered by his own brothers (who were intending to murder Lussurioso, who is also a pretty rotten character) is a sweet kind of justice for the audience.(hide spoiler)]As you can see, there are very few likeable characters in this play. This may be a deliberate choice on the playwright's part; the characters are clearly types, almost like allegorical figures in a medieval morality play (which is demonstrated in their names: Vindice, Gloriana, Ambitioso, Spurio (who is, as his name suggests, an actual bastard)). My preliminary reading probably didn't get past the surface of the play, and I was left with an impression of the play's pessimism. One of my favourite lines reflects exactly this:LUSSURIOSO […] I know this, which I never learnt in schools: The world's divided into knaves and fools. (II: ii, ll. 4-5)

  • James Nicolay
    2018-12-20 03:47

    The experience of reading Thomas Middleton's "The Revenger's Tragedy" feels like so many things: there's a sense of guilty pleasure reading about the Kill Bill-esque bloodbath at the end of the play as well as the thickening conspiracy among family members and revengers ala HBO series Game of Thrones; it also feels like I'm reading a more mature and complete upgrade of the revenge tragedy genre that I read in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Titus Andronicus; and finally, it feels rewarding to recognize as well the conventions and literary traditions of the English theater improved all throughout Middleton's spectacular display of plot/conspiracy weaving as well as in the individual character developments--they may not achieve the AC Bradley requirements of the full development of the Shakesperian tragic characters, but the pathos that the audience feels towards the maligned Vindice and his family are ubiquitous and thoroughly felt.The multiple number of deaths at the last scene (character stabbing another character stabbing another character) sums up the intricate web of karma or cause and effect that we seen in the entire play. While this might seem hilarious to the desensitized modern viewers, it's undeniable that the bloodbath is the most natural way to end the revenge tragedy. The other deaths, on the other hand, such as the unfortunate execution of the Duchess' younger son can seem to be flat out hilarious as it contains the comedy element of mistaken identities, while the actual death of the Duke (with the witnessing of his cuckolding) arouses more pity and fear from the audience as the full magnitude of the wrath and spirit of vengeance are made felt to the Duke by the avenging brothers. The other instances of death which might be more appealing to the audience and readers are the contextual (offstage) deaths of Vindice's betrothed lady Gloriana and the brothers' father whose deaths are all attributed to the Duke: the fact that these are the driving forces behind all the gruesome actions and events in the entire play.   From reading Doctor Faustus to The Spanish Tragedy to Volpone, the Jacobean theatrical elements have changed dramatically (excuse the pun) as we can see less of the inferior touch of the traditional moral plays and more of the conventions of the classical Senecan and Greek tragedies. We see spectacles after spectacles, intrigues one after another, and the plot becomes ultimately complex that the audience cannot help but feel overwhelmed by the display of both the extreme ends of the morality of the characters, from the virtuous/virginal Castiza to the corrupted, lustful and abhorrent bastard Spurio. The playwright demonstrates a complex understanding of what it takes for a human to devolve into a monster and yet still seem reasonable due to their circumstances (how Spurio’s birth status explains a lot about his disposition and characteristics). We also see how the play has become ultimately political as it is shown during the reign of James I. Some critics argue that the play is a direct attack on the corruption within the Jacobean court, and it may also explain why the play was notoriously authorless for a very understandable reason. For a Renaissance drama, the play is very modern in its attributes and the style is, I dare say, very forward looking, as the psychological aspects of the major characters are explored vividly in their actions and speech.The Revenger’s Tragedy is definitely among the most enjoyable and the most realized and masterfully written masterpieces of the English Renaissance literature. With its fantastic show of spectacles and intriguing plot lines, complex display of human emotions and actions and employing of classical and English Renaissance play conventions, this drama should be enjoyed to be seen by everyone today who are curious what the period offers beyond Shakespeare’s plays.

  • Esdaile
    2018-11-21 04:41

    There is utter confusion about the authorship of a series of plays, whether they were written principally by Thomas Middleton or the shadowy Cyril Tourneur or a combination. Of the spate of revenge plays which followed in the wake of Thomas Kidd, this is a supreme masterpiece, albeit very limited in scope and intention. It is a relentless allegory of sin and death and it would be better to say of the writer of this play than of Webster as Eliot famously wrote of Webster "much possessed with death and saw the skull beneath the skin". Here everything is reduced to parody and allegory. Hamlet is mocked in the opening scene-the psuedo or ur Hamlet, a man dressed in black holding a skull and his name Vindice, the Italian for Avenger. The reason for doubting Middleton's authorship is that noweher else does he focus his language relentlessly on allegory-hardly a sentence here is "realsitic" does not serve the purpose of the presentation of a world of damned and doomed sinners. In favour of Middleton's authorship, is the same ghoullish and we would say today "pretty corny" punning and black humour "who's head's that then?" "your won brother's" "villain, I'll brain thee with it". On a skull which has been painted with corrosive poison: "she has a somewhat grave look about her". This is the quintessence of revenge tragedy and likewise a conclusion-what more could one write in the genre after this? Drama is here used a vehicle for a very puritanical political idea: the great ones of the court are corrupt and corrupting, in league with Death and the devil. The plague from the East and the sinner's disease brought back from the New World (syphilis) in the West, were punishments for luxury and laxity, both indulged in with rulers who did not work, such as the old palsy duke of this play. The conclusion wouldbe that it would be pleasing to God if there were no dukes (and no monarchs?) and God's state was established on earth. Calvin in Geneva seems to wink behind this condemnation of luxury, licentiousness and a nepotistic court of panderers and flatterers. This is the supreme and felicitous combination of Italian melodrama and English puritanism. Vindice is condemend and receives news of his condemnantion at the end in such a way as the playright might be prepared to allow his own craft to be condemned. I was the instrument but God must also burn the contaminated instrument. Plato wanted no poets in his Repoublic and the Protectorate closed all theatres. Within the scope of the limied ambition of what this play sets out to do, it triumphantly succeeds. It is the supreme work of the genre and within the confines of that limited ambition, a work of genious.

  • Simon Mcleish
    2018-12-19 23:49

    Originally published on my blog here in January 2001.Originally published anonymously, The Revenger's Tragedy was attributed to Tourneur later in the seventeenth century - but as part of a list of plays others of which were linked to the wrong authors. It is today apparently considered to be by John Middleton, but nobody can really know. Anonymous publication was not particularly uncommon, and the play has political nuances which may provide a motivation for the author to hide their identity.The plot of The Revenger's Tragedy is sufficiently convoluted that any summary of it seems to invite the rider "Confused? You will be after this episode" which followed the plot reminders in eighties spoof soap opera Soap. Basically, it is set at a decadent Italian court where the Duke's son has attempted to rape a virtuous woman, Gloriana; her death prompts her betrothed Vindice to swear revenge on the Duke's family. His plots are aided by the lusts and ambition of the various members of the family; most of them die flamboyantly before Vindice is led off to face justice at the end of the play.The political comment is highlighted by the name of Vindice's dead lover - Gloriana, the poetic nickname of Queen Elizabeth, who died three years before the play was first published. The name makes explicit an idea common to several similar plays of the time, that the court of James I was corrupt and depraved.Elizabeth's ministers were hardly better, but it appears to have hardly taken any time before her reign came to be regarded as a golden age.In the early seventeenth century, there was a genre of rather gothic revenge tragedies; Hamlet is on the fringes of it. They tended to be set in some foreign - usually Italian - court, and have a lot of baroque murders (here, for example, the Duke is killed when he kisses Gloriana's skull, which has had poison smeared on it) in poetic language; there are frequently hints of incest and other crimes. The Revenger's Tragedy is almost a parody of the genre, it is so fantastical and over the top. For a tragedy, it is great fun.

  • Leanna
    2018-11-26 01:31

    Let me begin by saying, I hate everything in this play. But I don't hate everything about it. It's one of my favorite Renaissance tragedies even though it constantly makes me cringe. It provides such an interesting look into Elizabethan gender relations and assumptions that I can't help but to enjoy it, if only to better understand what seems to be another world entirely. It's not because I agree, but in order to see how far we've come (and, when I recognize something from the play in my own life, how far we have to go). The examples of misogyny are frequent and voiced by all characters, male and female. Most of the characters were all very well-developed (into horrible people, but whatever) and the plot is intricate to say the least. So, cringe-worthy but worth the discomfort for a peek into sexist Renaissance attitudes.

  • Peter Heavenheld
    2018-11-27 01:52

    Vindice’s sister was raped and destroyed by a powerful family of scoundrels. Like a monomaniac, he sets out to bring about the downfall of those responsible, whose names themselves are caricatures Lussurioso [lecherous], Spurio [spurious ie. bastard] with his brother Hippolito’s aid. To achieve his vengeance, Vindice gains employment in their family. A brilliantly dark and apocalyptic vision, the product of twisted genius. No tragedy is complete without revenge, and this is the most perfect expression of that all-engulfing death. Highlights: the atmosphere of loathing upheld by a carefully formulated “symbol key” of visceral imagery, the symbolic characters, the opening scene with the skull (though very different to Hamlet meeting Yorick), the violent murders, especially at the masque, the trial. The language is spectacularly rich throughout.

  • Barry Pierce
    2018-11-25 05:40

    For centuries it was believed The Revenger’s Tragedy was play by Cyril Tourneur, however it is now widely believed to be a work by Thomas Middleton. First performed in 1606, it tells the tale of Vindice whose wife is murdered by the Duke on his wedding day. Set on revenge, Vindice plans on killing the Duke but things go awry and he accidentally kills quite a lot of people. This is a very strange play. For example, at one point Vindice is disguised as Piato, however Piato is ordered to be executed. Vindice is picked as the executioner. So Vindice must somehow execute himself. The play is very playful and clever in these ways. Dipped in a sheen of dark, black comedy The Revenger’s Tragedy is a classic play of revenge that subverts the very genre that it helps create.

  • Resa
    2018-11-21 23:49

    melodramatic, sardonic, sarcastic, over-the-top = just my kind of play!The Revenger's Tragedy begins with Vindice vowing vengeance to a skull that he is holding. The evil and cuckold duke has wronged Vindice and so he goes in disguise in order to get his vengeance. Revenge quickly turns into a disaster where the line between right and wrong is traversed. In between are a mother selling her daughters chastity, a son being wrongfully executed, and a kiss from a poisoned skull. This play is slightly less difficult than Shakespeare. I would recommend it to anyone who likes drama and who is looking for an intellectual read.

  • Ygraine
    2018-12-10 23:52

    "when the bad bleeds, then is the tragedy good." blood, and everything it carries, is as much a presence as any of the dramatis personae in the revenger's tragedy; familial blood and inheritance, the incestuous connection between those bound by law but not by blood, lust carried in the pulsing of blood, virginal blood, blood as vengeance, poison pumped through the body in the blood, blood on blood on blood. and by the end of the play, the fire burning in the blood of the revengers, vindice and hippolito, has been all but drowned in blood; their hunger sated, they give themselves over to execution and the vain hope follows them that "their blood may wash away all treason".

  • Thomas Jancis
    2018-11-22 03:52

    This text was incredibly helpful for a presentation and essay on the comparison between the play and the film “Revengers Tragedy”.I have to say I feel the film does manage to get the best parts of the play in as well as editing some of the parts that drag. (Much of Vindici’s opening monologue is placed throughout the first act of the film).I would recommend you have an interest in dark comedy and have tolerance for Jacobian dialogue.I have to say old Vini is in my “Top Ten Characters Who Monologue to Skulls”.Okay, “Top Two.” After Hamlet, it kind of falls apart.

  • Jay Eckard
    2018-11-28 05:36

    This is one of the dark gems of the English Renaissance. Murder it has, and plenty of it, but there's a rich mine of black humor in it, too (and skillful production could unearth even more than what's textual). What other, earlier editions don't stress -- and what Gibbons does in this -- is the strong ties this plays has with many other period pieces. And not just the Shakespearean notables you'd expect, but those by 'lesser' playwrights, too, like Heywood, Tourner, Marston and Middleton. And it makes me want to go re-watch Cox's film version, as well.Read 12/15/2011Re-read 4/8/2012Re-read 5/17/2015

  • Thom Dunn
    2018-12-07 23:40

    3-26-2010 Find this note in my New Mermaids edition: June 24, 1972 "This is more of a farce than a tragedy, a revenge farce, a bit like Arsenic and Old Lace." I can't remember a thing so am grateful for this note, wrong-headed as it may be. If you want to know what Shakespeare accomplished in Hamelt, Barroll told us, you best read Fredson Thayer Bowers REVENGE TRAGEDY and some of the {300?} examples he studied of the form before Shakespeare broke the mould.

  • Laura
    2018-12-02 05:50

    A play to show you just how completely convoluted revenge can be. I read this one since it was referenced in Dean's "Tam Lin".There is lots of humor, disguises, backstabbing, and gore in this crazy play. Its definitely worth a read. After reading, watch the 2003 movie version. Its a very interesting depiction of the play. Costumes, language, acting, all put a very strange twist on the play that is both funny and weird.

  • Benji
    2018-11-28 23:26

    One of my favorite revenge plays. It can be said that this play is like a version of Hamlet that started in the graveyard, where all the brooding, melancholy back & forth of Hamlet's earlier character disappeared, and we are left only with his revenging ghost persona.The Alex Cox film adaptation of this play is a bit odd and not quite as good as reading the play. But it's an interesting companion piece.Now how is that for a heady review! Sincerely,Ben's Hubris

  • Sophia Ramos
    2018-12-20 00:38

    So good! It's sometimes an absolute shame that Shakespeare overshadows other playwrights of the time, particularly Middleton, who had some pretty remarkable works. This one is among my favorites for how smart it is, and how great the characters are. It feeds a lot off of similar themes to Hamlet and Othello, but the fusion is what fuels me. Definitely worth reading!

  • Dom
    2018-11-24 23:24

    Great book; a must read for those who liked Shakespeare's 'Hamlet', the allusions to it are numerous and effective. 'The Revenger's Tragedy' is full of action; if you crave bloody murders and other such dramatic things, look no further. There are also thought-provoking themes and characters which can be empathised with even by a modern audience.

  • Jennifer
    2018-11-19 05:48

    The highlight of 'The Revenger's Tragedy' for me was Vindice's embittered speech about beauty to Gloriana's skull. It's creepy, sad and has a depth that I felt wasn't present in the rest of the play. That said, I appreciated the comedic and subversive elements and would be very interested in seeing a performance of it.

  • Aaron Thomas
    2018-11-27 23:31

    I think I am actually convinced that Middleton wrote this. I've been skeptical for years, but this time on re-reading I see just how sexist it is and misogyny was Middleton's middle name. The sexual morality in Revenger's Tragedy is about on par with WOMEN BEWARE WOMEN. I still like this play a lot, though, even if Middleton DID write it. It's no MAID'S TRAGEDY, but it's good.

  • Tim Hodkinson
    2018-12-16 00:29

    This was fantastic. A truly bloody, gory revenge tragedy and easily the best example of this genre of plays from the Jacobean age. Hamlet, Shakespeare's attempt in this arena, is a sickly, pale comparison. I had the privilege of seeing a revival performance of this play also a year ago and it was genuinely unsettling. Great stuff!

  • Amanda
    2018-12-01 22:49

    Death by poisoned skull. Certainly one possible way to take revenge. This is the Jacobean equivalent of 'The Cook, The Thief, his Wife and her Lover'. The plot is just as convoluted and keeping track of who is doing what with who is a task in itself.Enjoy!

  • Valerie
    2018-11-22 02:36

    Hard play to read, it was really dense and 16th English language is such a bitch. Saying that, it had some pretty funny parts and quite witty in some places. Plus, who can go past adultery, violence, revenge, "incest" and treason?

  • Jessica
    2018-12-02 00:33

    Sort of hilariously awful in retrospect - making out with a skull and not realizing it? seriously?! - but nonetheless an important step in the tradition of revenge tragedies. Added bonus: who actually wrote it?!

  • Ana Rigby
    2018-12-17 22:33

    Quite an entertaining reading. The way the various subplots entwine with the main plot is fairly amusing. The inclussion of black comedy is a bonus, as it makes it a lighter read (for a Renaissance play, at least). Recommended if you want to read a different kind of tragedy.